Let's summarize. The so-called "harm the interests of" actually refers to two types of behavior. One is at the same time damage the interests of property rights violations, one is to the detriment of non-infringement of property rights. We have no objection to Rothbard activists "detriment" We oppose the infringement of property rights. "Detriment" is not supported by law enforcement justification, property damage is.louis vuitton alma kwlouis vuitton alma kwLet's summarize. The so-called "harm the interests of" actually refers to two types of behavior. One is at the same time damage the interests of property rights violations, one is to the detriment of non-infringement of property rights. We have no objection to Rothbard activists "detriment" We oppose the infringement of property rights. "Detriment" is not supported by law enforcement justification, property damage is.louis vuitton alma kwFake LV LV really damage the interests of it? Not necessarily. Why? There are several reasons, explained the fake LV maker will not harm even advance the interests of real LV manufacturer:louis vuitton sunglasses ladies
From the point of view in terms of property rights, "detriment" behavior, there are two possibilities. The first one is related to the infringement of property rights, such as the B of A stolen car, then this is undoubtedly harm the interests of B.,louis vuitton galleria houston txlouis vuitton alma kwLV vendors should not only use legal tools to combat counterfeiting, you should also thank those fake LV workshop yet. Again, how to say? "Copy you think highly of you, do not give face shame."louis vuitton alma kwHello there! You raised a good question.louis vuitton alma kwHello there! You raised a good question.louis vuitton alma kwSecond, it does not involve the infringement of property rights. For example, C opened a restaurant, business is booming, Rijindoujin. D looked envious, so in the opposite C restaurant opened a similar restaurant and took away a lot of old customers C, resulting in a decline in revenue C. Suppose D use to open a restaurant equipment and other property theft C not come, then we can say that D is not prejudice the interests though C, but C does not infringe on the property?
Let's summarize. The so-called "harm the interests of" actually refers to two types of behavior. One is at the same time damage the interests of property rights violations, one is to the detriment of non-infringement of property rights. We have no objection to Rothbard activists "detriment" We oppose the infringement of property rights. "Detriment" is not supported by law enforcement justification, property damage is.louis vuitton alma kwlouis vuitton alma kwSecond, it does not involve the infringement of property rights. For example, C opened a restaurant, business is booming, Rijindoujin. D looked envious, so in the opposite C restaurant opened a similar restaurant and took away a lot of old customers C, resulting in a decline in revenue C. Suppose D use to open a restaurant equipment and other property theft C not come, then we can say that D is not prejudice the interests though C, but C does not infringe on the property?louis vuitton sunglasses wholesaleLong Biao: Cloth teacher, have a question, really fake LV LV damage the interests of it?louis vuitton alma kw